Talk:Coherent semantics
From LLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (→Main properties: typo) |
(→Mix rule: new section) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: Good idea. I've moved the section into the new page [[Semantics]]. |
: Good idea. I've moved the section into the new page [[Semantics]]. |
||
: [[User:Laurent Regnier|Laurent Regnier]] 21:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
: [[User:Laurent Regnier|Laurent Regnier]] 21:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Mix rule == |
||
| + | |||
| + | The mix rule probably deserves its own page, in particular for use in [[game semantics]]. |
||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Olivier Laurent|Olivier Laurent]] 12:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:10, 14 March 2009
linear logical relations
It would be nice to clarify the common points between the cliqued space presentation and the section about closure operators on the phase semantics page.
Olivier Laurent 12:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Main properties
Since this section does not really rely on the coherent model, it might be more natural to move it on a specific page (or in the general setting of categorical semantics). Isomorphisms are also a related topic.
Olivier Laurent 20:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Good idea. I've moved the section into the new page Semantics.
- Laurent Regnier 21:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Mix rule
The mix rule probably deserves its own page, in particular for use in game semantics.
Olivier Laurent 12:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
