Finiteness semantics
Lionel Vaux (Talk | contribs) m (math typo) |
Lionel Vaux (Talk | contribs) (support for \[ and \]) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The construction of finiteness spaces follows a well known pattern. It is given by the following notion of orthogonality: <math>a\mathrel \bot a'</math> iff <math>a\cap a'</math> is finite. Then one unrolls familiar definitions, as we do in the following paragraphs. |
The construction of finiteness spaces follows a well known pattern. It is given by the following notion of orthogonality: <math>a\mathrel \bot a'</math> iff <math>a\cap a'</math> is finite. Then one unrolls familiar definitions, as we do in the following paragraphs. |
||
− | Let <math>A</math> be a set. Denote by <math>\mathfrak P(A)</math> the powerset of <math>A</math> and by <math>\mathfrak P_f(A)</math> the set of all finite subsets of <math>A</math>. Let <math>{\mathfrak F} \subseteq \mathfrak P(A)</math> any set of subsets of <math>A</math>. We define the pre-dual of <math>{\mathfrak f}</math> in <math>A</math> as <math>{\mathfrak f}^{\bot_{A}}=\left\{a'\subseteq A;\ \forall a\in{\mathfrak f},\ a\cap a'\in\mathfrak P_f(A)\right\}</math>. In general we will omit the subscript in the pre-dual notation and just write <math>{\mathfrak f}\orth</math>. For all <math>{\mathfrak f}\subseteq\mathfrak P(A)</math>, we have the following immediate properties: <math>\mathfrak P_f(A) \subseteq {\mathfrak f}\orth</math>; <math>{\mathfrak f}\subseteq {\mathfrak f}\biorth</math>; if <math>{\mathfrak G}\subseteq{\mathfrak f}</math>, <math>{\mathfrak f}\orth\subseteq {\mathfrak G}\orth</math>. By the last two, we get <math>{\mathfrak f}\orth = {\mathfrak f}\triorth</math>. A finiteness structure on <math>A</math> is then a set <math>{\mathfrak f}</math> of subsets of <math>A</math> such that <math>{\mathfrak f}\biorth = {\mathfrak f}</math>. |
+ | Let <math>A</math> be a set. Denote by <math>\mathfrak P(A)</math> the powerset of <math>A</math> and by <math>\mathfrak P_f(A)</math> the set of all finite subsets of <math>A</math>. Let <math>{\mathfrak F} \subseteq \mathfrak P(A)</math> any set of subsets of <math>A</math>. We define the pre-dual of <math>{\mathfrak F}</math> in <math>A</math> as <math>{\mathfrak F}^{\bot_{A}}=\left\{a'\subseteq A;\ \forall a\in{\mathfrak F},\ a\cap a'\in\mathfrak P_f(A)\right\}</math>. In general we will omit the subscript in the pre-dual notation and just write <math>{\mathfrak F}\orth</math>. For all <math>{\mathfrak F}\subseteq\mathfrak P(A)</math>, we have the following immediate properties: <math>\mathfrak P_f(A) \subseteq {\mathfrak F}\orth</math>; <math>{\mathfrak F}\subseteq {\mathfrak F}\biorth</math>; if <math>{\mathfrak G}\subseteq{\mathfrak F}</math>, <math>{\mathfrak F}\orth\subseteq {\mathfrak G}\orth</math>. By the last two, we get <math>{\mathfrak F}\orth = {\mathfrak F}\triorth</math>. A finiteness structure on <math>A</math> is then a set <math>{\mathfrak F}</math> of subsets of <math>A</math> such that <math>{\mathfrak F}\biorth = {\mathfrak F}</math>. |
A finiteness space is a dependant pair <math>{\mathcal A}=\left(\web{\mathcal A},\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)\right)</math> where <math>\web {\mathcal A}</math> is the underlying set (the web of <math>{\mathcal A}</math>) and <math>\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)</math> is a finiteness structure on <math>\web {\mathcal A}</math>. We then write <math>{\mathcal A}\orth</math> for the dual finiteness space: <math>\web {{\mathcal A}\orth} = \web {\mathcal A}</math> and <math>\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal A}\orth\right)=\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal A}\right)^{\bot}</math>. The elements of <math>\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)</math> are called the finitary subsets of <math>{\mathcal A}</math>. |
A finiteness space is a dependant pair <math>{\mathcal A}=\left(\web{\mathcal A},\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)\right)</math> where <math>\web {\mathcal A}</math> is the underlying set (the web of <math>{\mathcal A}</math>) and <math>\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)</math> is a finiteness structure on <math>\web {\mathcal A}</math>. We then write <math>{\mathcal A}\orth</math> for the dual finiteness space: <math>\web {{\mathcal A}\orth} = \web {\mathcal A}</math> and <math>\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal A}\orth\right)=\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal A}\right)^{\bot}</math>. The elements of <math>\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)</math> are called the finitary subsets of <math>{\mathcal A}</math>. |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
For all set <math>A</math>, <math>(A,\mathfrak P_f(A))</math> is a finiteness space and <math>(A,\mathfrak P_f(A))\orth = (A,\mathfrak P(A))</math>. In particular, each finite set <math>A</math> is the web of exactly one finiteness space: <math>(A,\mathfrak P_f(A))=(A,\mathfrak P(A))</math>. We introduce the following two: <math>\zero = \zero\orth = \left(\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\right)</math> and <math>\one = \one\orth = \left(\{\emptyset\}, \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\right)</math>. We also introduce the finiteness space of natural numbers <math>{\mathcal N}</math> by: <math>|{\mathcal N}|={\mathbf N}</math> and <math>a\in\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal N\right)</math> iff <math>a</math> is finite. We write <math>\mathcal O=\{0\}\in\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal N}\right)</math>. |
For all set <math>A</math>, <math>(A,\mathfrak P_f(A))</math> is a finiteness space and <math>(A,\mathfrak P_f(A))\orth = (A,\mathfrak P(A))</math>. In particular, each finite set <math>A</math> is the web of exactly one finiteness space: <math>(A,\mathfrak P_f(A))=(A,\mathfrak P(A))</math>. We introduce the following two: <math>\zero = \zero\orth = \left(\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\right)</math> and <math>\one = \one\orth = \left(\{\emptyset\}, \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}\right)</math>. We also introduce the finiteness space of natural numbers <math>{\mathcal N}</math> by: <math>|{\mathcal N}|={\mathbf N}</math> and <math>a\in\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal N\right)</math> iff <math>a</math> is finite. We write <math>\mathcal O=\{0\}\in\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal N}\right)</math>. |
||
− | Notice that <math>{\mathfrak F}</math> is a finiteness structure iff it is of the form <math>{\mathfrak G}\orth</math>. It follows that any finiteness structure <math>{\mathfrak f}</math> is downwards closed for inclusion, and closed under finite unions and arbitrary intersections. Notice however that <math>{\mathfrak f}</math> is not closed under directed unions in general: for all <math>k\in{\mathbf N}</math>, write <math>k{\downarrow}=\left\{j;\ j\le k\right\}\in\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal N}\right)</math>; then <math>k{\downarrow}\subseteq k'{\downarrow}</math> as soon as <math>k\le k'</math>, but <math>\bigcup_{k\ge0} k{\downarrow}={\mathbf N}\not\in\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal N}\right)</math>. |
+ | Notice that <math>{\mathfrak F}</math> is a finiteness structure iff it is of the form <math>{\mathfrak G}\orth</math>. It follows that any finiteness structure <math>{\mathfrak F}</math> is downwards closed for inclusion, and closed under finite unions and arbitrary intersections. Notice however that <math>{\mathfrak F}</math> is not closed under directed unions in general: for all <math>k\in{\mathbf N}</math>, write <math>k{\downarrow}=\left\{j;\ j\le k\right\}\in\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal N}\right)</math>; then <math>k{\downarrow}\subseteq k'{\downarrow}</math> as soon as <math>k\le k'</math>, but <math>\bigcup_{k\ge0} k{\downarrow}={\mathbf N}\not\in\mathfrak F\left({\mathcal N}\right)</math>. |
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B},{\mathcal B}) |
\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B},{\mathcal B}) |
||
\end{eqnarray*} |
\end{eqnarray*} |
||
− | and if <math>f\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal C},{\mathcal A})</math> and <math>g\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal C},{\mathcal B})</math>, pairing is given by: \[\left\langle f,g\right\rangle = \left\{\left(\gamma,(1,\alpha)\right);\ (\gamma,\alpha)\in f\right\} \cup \left\{\left(\gamma,(2,\beta)\right);\ (\gamma,\beta)\in g\right\} \in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal C},{\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B}).\] |
+ | and if <math>f\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal C},{\mathcal A})</math> and <math>g\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal C},{\mathcal B})</math>, pairing is given by: |
+ | |||
+ | <math>\left\langle f,g\right\rangle = \left\{\left(\gamma,(1,\alpha)\right);\ (\gamma,\alpha)\in f\right\} \cup \left\{\left(\gamma,(2,\beta)\right);\ (\gamma,\beta)\in g\right\} \in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal C},{\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B}).</math> |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
The unique morphism from <math>{\mathcal A}</math> to <math>\zero</math> is the empty relation. The co-cartesian structure is obtained symmetrically. |
The unique morphism from <math>{\mathcal A}</math> to <math>\zero</math> is the empty relation. The co-cartesian structure is obtained symmetrically. |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
It can be shown that <math>\mathfrak F\left(\oc{\mathcal A}\right) = \left\{\overline a\subseteq\mathfrak M_f\left(\web{{\mathcal A}}\right);\ \bigcup_{\overline\alpha\in \overline a}\mathrm{Support}\left(\overline \alpha\right)\in\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)\right\}</math>. |
It can be shown that <math>\mathfrak F\left(\oc{\mathcal A}\right) = \left\{\overline a\subseteq\mathfrak M_f\left(\web{{\mathcal A}}\right);\ \bigcup_{\overline\alpha\in \overline a}\mathrm{Support}\left(\overline \alpha\right)\in\mathfrak F\left(\mathcal A\right)\right\}</math>. |
||
Then, for all <math>f\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal A},{\mathcal B})</math>, we set |
Then, for all <math>f\in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal A},{\mathcal B})</math>, we set |
||
− | \[\oc f =\left\{\left(\left[\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n\right],\left[\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_n\right]\right);\ \forall i,\ (\alpha_i,\beta_i)\in f\right\} \in \mathbf{Fin}(\oc {\mathcal A}, \oc {\mathcal B}),\] |
+ | |
+ | |||
+ | <math>\oc f =\left\{\left(\left[\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n\right],\left[\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_n\right]\right);\ \forall i,\ (\alpha_i,\beta_i)\in f\right\} \in \mathbf{Fin}(\oc {\mathcal A}, \oc {\mathcal B}),</math> |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
which defines a functor. |
which defines a functor. |
||
Natural transformations |
Natural transformations |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<math>\left\{([],\emptyset)\right\}\in\mathbf{Fin}(\oc\zero,\one)</math> |
<math>\left\{([],\emptyset)\right\}\in\mathbf{Fin}(\oc\zero,\one)</math> |
||
and |
and |
||
− | \[\left\{ |
+ | |
+ | |||
+ | <math>\left\{ |
||
\left(\overline\alpha_l+\overline\beta_r,\left(\overline\alpha,\overline\beta\right)\right);\ |
\left(\overline\alpha_l+\overline\beta_r,\left(\overline\alpha,\overline\beta\right)\right);\ |
||
(\overline\alpha_l,\overline\alpha)\in\oc\lambda_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal |
(\overline\alpha_l,\overline\alpha)\in\oc\lambda_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal |
||
B}}\wedge(\overline\beta_r,\overline\beta)\in\oc\rho_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal |
B}}\wedge(\overline\beta_r,\overline\beta)\in\oc\rho_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal |
||
B}}\right\} \in\mathbf{Fin}(\oc({\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B}),\oc{\mathcal |
B}}\right\} \in\mathbf{Fin}(\oc({\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B}),\oc{\mathcal |
||
− | A}\tens\oc{\mathcal B}).\] |
+ | A}\tens\oc{\mathcal B}).</math> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
More generally, we have |
More generally, we have |
||
<math>\oc\left({\mathcal A}_1\oplus\cdots\oplus{\mathcal A}_n\right)\cong\oc{\mathcal A}_1\tens\cdots\tens\oc{\mathcal A}_n</math>. |
<math>\oc\left({\mathcal A}_1\oplus\cdots\oplus{\mathcal A}_n\right)\cong\oc{\mathcal A}_1\tens\cdots\tens\oc{\mathcal A}_n</math>. |
Revision as of 18:56, 22 May 2009
The category of finiteness spaces and finitary relations was introduced by Ehrhard, refining the purely relational model of linear logic. A finiteness space is a set equipped with a finiteness structure, i.e. a particular set of subsets which are said to be finitary; and the model is such that the usual relational denotation of a proof in linear logic is always a finitary subset of its conclusion. By the usual co-Kleisli construction, this also provides a model of the simply typed lambda-calculus: the cartesian closed category .
The main property of finiteness spaces is that the intersection of two finitary subsets of dual types is always finite. This feature allows to reformulate Girard's quantitative semantics in a standard algebraic setting, where morphisms interpreting typed λ-terms are analytic functions between the topological vector spaces generated by vectors with finitary supports. This provided the semantical foundations of Ehrhard-Regnier's differential λ-calculus and motivated the general study of a differential extension of linear logic.
It is worth noticing that finiteness spaces can accomodate typed λ-calculi only: for instance, the relational semantics of fixpoint combinators is never finitary. The whole point of the finiteness construction is actually to reject infinite computations. Indeed, from a logical point of view, computation is cut elimination: the finiteness structure ensures the intermediate sets involved in the relational interpretation of a cut are all finite. In that sense, the finitary semantics is intrinsically typed.
Contents |
Finiteness spaces
The construction of finiteness spaces follows a well known pattern. It is given by the following notion of orthogonality: iff is finite. Then one unrolls familiar definitions, as we do in the following paragraphs.
Let A be a set. Denote by the powerset of A and by the set of all finite subsets of A. Let any set of subsets of A. We define the pre-dual of in A as . In general we will omit the subscript in the pre-dual notation and just write . For all , we have the following immediate properties: ; ; if , . By the last two, we get . A finiteness structure on A is then a set of subsets of A such that .
A finiteness space is a dependant pair where is the underlying set (the web of ) and is a finiteness structure on . We then write for the dual finiteness space: and . The elements of are called the finitary subsets of .
Example.
For all set A, is a finiteness space and . In particular, each finite set A is the web of exactly one finiteness space: . We introduce the following two: and . We also introduce the finiteness space of natural numbers by: and iff a is finite. We write .
Notice that is a finiteness structure iff it is of the form . It follows that any finiteness structure is downwards closed for inclusion, and closed under finite unions and arbitrary intersections. Notice however that is not closed under directed unions in general: for all , write ; then as soon as , but .
Multiplicatives
For all finiteness spaces and , we define by and . It can be shown that , where and are the obvious projections.
Let be a relation from A to B, we write . For all , we set . If moreover , we define . Then, setting , is characterized as follows: \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{r@{\ iff\ }l} & , and , \\ & , and , \\ & , and , \end{tabular} \end{center} The elements of are called finitary relations from to . By the previous characterization, the identity relation is finitary, and the composition of two finitary relations is also finitary. One can thus define the category of finiteness spaces and finitary relations: the objects of are all finiteness spaces, and . Equipped with the tensor product , is symmetric monoidal, with unit ; it is monoidal closed by the definition of ; it is * -autonomous by the obvious isomorphism between and .
Example.
Setting and , we have and .
Additives
We now introduce the cartesian structure of . We define by and where denotes the disjoint union of sets: . We have . The category is both cartesian and co-cartesian, with being the product and co-product, and the initial and terminal object. Projections are given by: \begin{eqnarray*} \lambda_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal B}}&=&\left\{\left((1,\alpha),\alpha\right);\ \alpha\in\web{\mathcal A}\right\} \in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B},{\mathcal A}) \\ \rho_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal B}}&=&\left\{\left((2,\beta),\beta\right);\ \beta\in\web{\mathcal B}\right\} \in\mathbf{Fin}({\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B},{\mathcal B}) \end{eqnarray*} and if and , pairing is given by:
The unique morphism from to is the empty relation. The co-cartesian structure is obtained symmetrically.
Example.
Write . Then is an isomorphism.
Exponentials
If A is a set, we denote by the set of all finite multisets of elements of A, and if , we write . If , we denote its support by . For all finiteness space , we define by: and . It can be shown that . Then, for all , we set
which defines a functor.
Natural transformations
and
make this functor a comonad.
Example.
We have isomorphisms and
Failed to parse (lexing error): \left\{ \left(\overline\alpha_l+\overline\beta_r,\left(\overline\alpha,\overline\beta\right)\right);\ (\overline\alpha_l,\overline\alpha)\in\oc\lambda_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal B}}\wedge(\overline\beta_r,\overline\beta)\in\oc\rho_{{\mathcal A},{\mathcal B}}\right\} \in\mathbf{Fin}(\oc({\mathcal A}\oplus{\mathcal B}),\oc{\mathcal A}\tens\oc{\mathcal B}).
More generally, we have .