Translations of intuitionistic logic
m (→Call-by-name Girard's translation A\imp B \mapsto \oc{A}\limp B: typo) |
m (→Call-by-value translation A\imp B \mapsto \oc{(A\limp B)}: typos) |
||
Line 394: | Line 394: | ||
\LabelRule{\limp L} |
\LabelRule{\limp L} |
||
\BinRule{\Gamma^v,\Delta^v,A^v\limp B^v\vdash C^v} |
\BinRule{\Gamma^v,\Delta^v,A^v\limp B^v\vdash C^v} |
||
− | \LabelRule{\oc L} |
+ | \LabelRule{\oc d L} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\Delta^v,\oc{(A^v\limp B^v)}\vdash C^v} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\Delta^v,\oc{(A^v\limp B^v)}\vdash C^v} |
||
\DisplayProof |
\DisplayProof |
||
Line 428: | Line 428: | ||
\LabelRule{\tens L} |
\LabelRule{\tens L} |
||
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,A^v\tens B^v\vdash C^v} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,A^v\tens B^v\vdash C^v} |
||
− | \LabelRule{\oc L} |
+ | \LabelRule{\oc d L} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\oc{(A^v\tens B^v)}\vdash C^v} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\oc{(A^v\tens B^v)}\vdash C^v} |
||
\DisplayProof |
\DisplayProof |
||
Line 524: | Line 524: | ||
\LabelRule{\forall L} |
\LabelRule{\forall L} |
||
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\forall\xi A^v\vdash C^v} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\forall\xi A^v\vdash C^v} |
||
− | \LabelRule{\oc L} |
+ | \LabelRule{\oc d L} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\oc{\forall\xi A^v}\vdash C^v} |
\UnaRule{\Gamma^v,\oc{\forall\xi A^v}\vdash C^v} |
||
\DisplayProof |
\DisplayProof |
Revision as of 21:07, 5 October 2009
The genesis of linear logic comes with a decomposition of the intuitionistic implication. Once linear logic properly defined, it corresponds to a translation of intuitionistic logic into linear logic, often called Girard's translation. In fact Jean-Yves Girard has defined two translations in his linear logic paper[1]. We call them the call-by-name translation and the call-by-value translation.
These translations can be extended to translations of classical logic into linear logic.
Contents |
Call-by-name Girard's translation
Formulas are translated as:
This is extended to sequents by .
This allows one to translate the rules of intuitionistic logic into linear logic:
Call-by-value translation
Formulas are translated as:
The translation of any formula starts with , we define such that .
The translation of sequents is .
This allows one to translate the rules of intuitionistic logic into linear logic:
We use .
Alternative presentation
It is also possible to define as the primitive construction.
If we define , we have and thus we obtain the same translation of proofs.
Call-by-value Girard's translation
The original version of the call-by-value translation given by Jean-Yves Girard[1] is an optimisation of the previous one using properties of positive formulas.
Formulas are translated as:
The translation of any formula is a positive formula.
The translation of sequents is .
This allows one to translate the rules of intuitionistic logic into linear logic:
We use .
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Girard, Jean-Yves. Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science. Volume 50, Issue 1, pp. 1-101, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(87)90045-4, 1987.